Franchisor as exclusive supplier

krispy kremeWhat can go wrong if your franchisor is also your supplier? A lot. Krispy Kreme, along with many franchisees such as Dippin’ Dots, are required to buy supplies direcly from the company. So what’s the big deal, right? Well, what do you do if they threaten to not ship supplies unless you agree to new terms, such as payment upfront instead of the normal 30-35 days? If you don’t comply you can’t operate your business. That was the unfortunate situation faced by a few Krispy Kreme franchisees. Krispy Kreme threatened to stop shipments unless it received $1 million that is in dispute (it didn’t say if those were late payments or due to new Agreement terms sought by Krispy Kream). In this case, the franchisees were lucky and the court agreed with their argument. The court ordered Krispy Kreme to resume shipment of supplies under the traditional terms of the agreement. The order includes assertions by the franchisee that Krispy Kreme –

"has refused to ship Plaintiff ingredients, supplies, and equipment, including doughnut mix – all of which are necessary to Plaintiff’s business operations – on terms previously agreed to by the parties."

Similar Posts:

Article by Ryan Knoll

Ryan is an attorney and valuation specialist residing in Chicago. He chronicles his thoughts and research on FranchisePundit.com. You may reach him by email ryanknoll@gmail.com or mobile telephone 312-715-8115. Read 448 articles by
3 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Al says:

    Does the franchisee get reimbursed by the franchisor for legal fees? It seems unfair that if the franchisor is in the wrong that the franchisee would have to bear the burden of paying for legal representation.

  2. Legalpundit says:

    Al- it depends on the franchise agreement and perhaps any applicable laws. Generally, the “American” rule is that each party pays their own attorney
    fees in the absence of an agreement or statute. The “English” rule is loser pays. And in some states if one party has granted itself the unilateral right for attorney fee’s then, by operation of law, it is made a bilateral agreement– meaning the prevailing party could get them.

  3. [...]  Follow up to Franchisor as Exlusive Supplier (Krispy Kreme case) [...]

Leave a Reply




RSS Discussion Forum

  • Re: De-Identify February 7, 2012
    There are several issues here.1)   Ethics – though your franchisor may not have lived up to your expectations if they are meeting the letter of the law then I am not sure you have the moral upperhand.  If you signed on to pay and advertising fee without... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 5, 2012
    it would be leaving early..Its a Franchise that has lost over 30 units in the past few years. and is not living up to what we bought into.. advertising fee's are not being used on anything for the franchisee. and there is no support from the franchise... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 4, 2012
    Quote from: jerichox on February 01, 2012, 08:27:34 AMJust wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of ... […]
  • De-Identify February 1, 2012
    Just wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of the walls to the lights that hang.. How would you go about doing this.... […]
  • Re: franchise directory January 8, 2012
    Remember if  you approach a franchisor and that franchisor uses brokers you should be able to reduce your franchise fee by the price of the commision they would pay to a broker.    You have bargaining power before you sign the FA not after!!!!Moreover... […]

Blog Categories

Old Posts