Lost the Game of Chicken

chicken kitchenI lived in South Florida for about a year at regularly ate at the Chicken Kitchen (background article). The restaurant flame roasts chicken on a very large open grille for all guests to see, and then chops up the whole chickens for plates, bowls or burritos. The bowls were quite healthy, filling and reasonably priced.

Chicken Kitchen was recently involved in a nail-biter law suit. One of its franchisees caused a serious auto accident. Who was liable? Only the driver and franchisee, or also the franchisor?

Let’s do this law school style (all you lawyers know what I mean):

Plaintiff (P): Joshua Szentpaly, motorcycle rider hit; represented by lead attorney Ervin A. Gonzalez with assistance from Deborah Gander.

Defendant (D): Chicken Kitchen USA LLC; represented by Frank Alloca and Bill Davis of the law firm Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney in Miami.

Facts: An employee of D’s franchisee was driving to make food deliveries for its restaurant. P was driving down the street in his motorcycle with friends. The franchisee’s driver hit P, causing severe neurological damage and the loss of his right arm.

P’s Claim: The Miami franchisee was an independent contractor, and it was therefore not responsible for any of the franchisee’s actions and omissions.

D’s Claim: Its franchisee was an independent contractor and therefore was not responsible for their acts and omissions

Issue: Is a franchisor legally responsible for the actions of its franchisee’s employee when the employee crashes a stop sign and causes bodily injury?

Holding: Yes.

Reasoning: Chicken Kitchen USA is legally responsible for the acts and omissions of its franchisee because it controlled or had the right to control the day to day business activities of its franchisee pursuant to its franchise agreement and operating manual.

The jury subsequently award Szentpaly $2 million. I’m not sure whether insurance covered Chicken Kitchen USA LLC for its liability.

Here is the Plaintiff Szentpaly’s web site with pictures and his description of the incident.

Similar Posts:

Article by Ryan Knoll

Ryan is an attorney and valuation specialist residing in Chicago. He chronicles his thoughts and research on FranchisePundit.com. You may reach him by email ryanknoll@gmail.com or mobile telephone 312-715-8115. Read 448 articles by
2 Comments Post a Comment
  1. LAURA says:

    Don’t remind of law school FP!

  2. Anonymous says:

    So if someone slips and falls in my store, can they sue the franchisor?

Leave a Reply




RSS Discussion Forum

  • Re: De-Identify February 7, 2012
    There are several issues here.1)   Ethics – though your franchisor may not have lived up to your expectations if they are meeting the letter of the law then I am not sure you have the moral upperhand.  If you signed on to pay and advertising fee without... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 5, 2012
    it would be leaving early..Its a Franchise that has lost over 30 units in the past few years. and is not living up to what we bought into.. advertising fee's are not being used on anything for the franchisee. and there is no support from the franchise... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 4, 2012
    Quote from: jerichox on February 01, 2012, 08:27:34 AMJust wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of ... […]
  • De-Identify February 1, 2012
    Just wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of the walls to the lights that hang.. How would you go about doing this.... […]
  • Re: franchise directory January 8, 2012
    Remember if  you approach a franchisor and that franchisor uses brokers you should be able to reduce your franchise fee by the price of the commision they would pay to a broker.    You have bargaining power before you sign the FA not after!!!!Moreover... […]

Blog Categories

Old Posts