Substantiated Rumor: Potbelly’s Going Public

100-unit Potbelly’s, who recruited DeLuca from Starbucks as an investor and board member, is planning to raise money in the public capital markets with an IPO in the 3rd quarter of 2007.

Chicagoans have been enjoying Potbelly’s toasty-warm sandwiches, fresh homemade desserts, and old-fashioned milkshakes at the original Lincoln Avenue store since 1977. The original stand was in an antique shop, formed to feed and attract hungry locals to browse the atiques.

Current owner Bryant Keil purchased the business in 1996, and has since expanded its presence to Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minneapolis, Ohio, and Texas. Potbelly has over 100 company owned-locations and the growth continues, albeit at an intentionally steady, controlled pace.

Background article.

Similar Posts:

Article by Ryan Knoll

Ryan is an attorney and valuation specialist residing in Chicago. He chronicles his thoughts and research on FranchisePundit.com. You may reach him by email ryanknoll@gmail.com or mobile telephone 312-715-8115. Read 448 articles by
3 Comments Post a Comment
  1. Anonymous says:

    Would the ipo be a blowout? They have good names in the deal, but their growth is too slow for a public company. The rate of store openings would have to increase which may not be too easy being all corporate owned

  2. Samantha says:

    There is a Potbelly’s in one of the Chicago airports. The product is good, but not really that extraordinary. It is better Quiznos who also toasts their subs. The antique decorations and old-fashioned charm, along with the handmade shakes give it enough edge to make money in a competitive market. It would make a good study on in the level of differentiation needed for customers to shift buying habits.

  3. Nicholas says:

    having been throught the starbucks OPI, i believe that Potbellys has a viable commodity with the leadership to support the business. If and when they do go public, you can bet i will be there with open arms (and wallet)

Leave a Reply




RSS Discussion Forum

  • Re: De-Identify February 7, 2012
    There are several issues here.1)   Ethics – though your franchisor may not have lived up to your expectations if they are meeting the letter of the law then I am not sure you have the moral upperhand.  If you signed on to pay and advertising fee without... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 5, 2012
    it would be leaving early..Its a Franchise that has lost over 30 units in the past few years. and is not living up to what we bought into.. advertising fee's are not being used on anything for the franchisee. and there is no support from the franchise... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 4, 2012
    Quote from: jerichox on February 01, 2012, 08:27:34 AMJust wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of ... […]
  • De-Identify February 1, 2012
    Just wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of the walls to the lights that hang.. How would you go about doing this.... […]
  • Re: franchise directory January 8, 2012
    Remember if  you approach a franchisor and that franchisor uses brokers you should be able to reduce your franchise fee by the price of the commision they would pay to a broker.    You have bargaining power before you sign the FA not after!!!!Moreover... […]

Blog Categories

Old Posts