The Inside Scoop
      on Franchises
 
 
 
CALL FOR BLOGGERS!
Do you have a professional perspective on franchising? Email or call Ryan @ 312-730-5089
 
 
 

No Royalty Coffee Franchise? I Doubt it!

Categories: I'm neutral on it
By Jim Coen on February 20, 2007 @ 9:47 pm

The Human Bean, an Oregon-based specialty coffee drive-thru franchise, recently announced in a company press release “it is expanding with 28 stores now open and area development agreements for another 110 drive-thrus in the U.S.”

The Human Bean claims they are offering an attractive franchise concept that is almost unheard of in the industry: no royalty fees!!!

I’m sure that is sweet music to some ears, but I suggest buyer beware. Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? What’s the catch? 

A quick look at the FAQ off the Human Bean Website reveals:

Q: What are the ongoing royalty fees?

A: We do not collect a royalty fee on sales.  We earn revenues from bulk sales of coffee beans, cups, lids and other supplies to our franchisees. 

Sounds like a “Tie-Buying Clause” some say the most dreaded clause in franchising. 

The press release goes on to say: “Not having to pay franchise royalty fees each month means more money in the pockets of the franchisees.” Not necessarily; if the cost of the beans, cups, lids and other supplies are above market prices, then more money may not be left in franchisees pocket.

I’m not passing judgment on the Human Bean, I don’t know all the details, the stores look pretty cool, and I believe in “fair trade” coffee but if it sounds too good to be true it probably is!

Cross Posted at: Let’s Talk Franchising

Similar Posts:


AddThis Social Bookmark Button| | Permanent link





5 Responses to “No Royalty Coffee Franchise? I Doubt it!”  

  1. # 1 Laura

    So ….

    IF COGS x Markup > GROSS x AVERAGE ROYALTY,

    then it is not a good deal?


    [[ Quote ]]
  2. # 2 Michael Webster

    Interesting that their UFOC is not on Caleasi, despite having one franchise in California.


    [[ Quote ]]
  3. # 3 Jim Coen

    Good Question Laura. I’m not saying its a bad deal. I’m just saying nothing is free. You have to pay for use of the brand or there is little no incentive for the brand to grow. Promoting a franchise opportunity by saying “no royalty fees” is nothing more than a hook. It maybe a pretty good hook. The fees are built into the cost of the product. The franchise ties the franchisee into buying product from them. Its not the first Product Oriented Franchise, there have been many i.e. Baskin Robbins, Singer Sewing Machine, Gas stations, to name a few.


    [[ Quote ]]
  4. # 4 Jim Coen

    Michael, Could it be a company owned store in CA?


    [[ Quote ]]
  5. # 5 Michael Webster

    Could be. But they appear to be marketing franchise sales in California, at least from the website.


    [[ Quote ]]

Leave a Reply

(required)


About Us   |   Contact Us    |    Terms of Use    |   © Copyright 2005-2007
38 queries. 1.366 seconds.