Raving Brands Litigation

Raving Brands Faces Copyright, Employee Litigation

COPYRIGHT CL AIM: Raving Brands’ legal troubles go beyond three franchisee lawsuits that allege fraud, misrepresentation, and undisclosed kickbacks. The holding company, which recently sold Moe’s Southwest Grill to FOCUS Brands, faces copyright and former employee disputes. In January, under the radar, federal courts ruled in favor of artist Janie Atkinson, who claimed Moe’s used her paintings—“Lady John” and “Sir John”—without permission. Both sides are currently arguing damages.

EMPLOYEE LITIGATION
: In August 2005, former franchise sales director Anne Wheatley filed suit, alleging she was denied promised stock options in Moe’s and Mama Fu’s…

Wheatley requested 50,000 shares of Moe’s stock and 50,000 shares of Mama Fu’s stock. According to her 2004 Schedule K-1 (IRS Form 1120S), Wheatley indeed had deductions taken from her accounts, with a 0.43 percentage of stock ownership for the tax year. The tax documents do not say, however, whether the deductions were for restricted stock. In February 2005, two months before Wheatley requested her dividends, Raving Brands’ tax accountant advised management to revise shareholder options to help franchise expansion goals.

Similar Posts:

Article by Ryan Knoll

Ryan is an attorney and valuation specialist residing in Chicago. He chronicles his thoughts and research on FranchisePundit.com. You may reach him by email ryanknoll@gmail.com or mobile telephone 312-715-8115. Read 448 articles by
One Comments Post a Comment
  1. Anonymous says:

    This doesn’t say much about how Raving Brand would treat its franchisees, though it may be a window in their character.

Leave a Reply




RSS Discussion Forum

  • Re: De-Identify February 7, 2012
    There are several issues here.1)   Ethics – though your franchisor may not have lived up to your expectations if they are meeting the letter of the law then I am not sure you have the moral upperhand.  If you signed on to pay and advertising fee without... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 5, 2012
    it would be leaving early..Its a Franchise that has lost over 30 units in the past few years. and is not living up to what we bought into.. advertising fee's are not being used on anything for the franchisee. and there is no support from the franchise... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 4, 2012
    Quote from: jerichox on February 01, 2012, 08:27:34 AMJust wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of ... […]
  • De-Identify February 1, 2012
    Just wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of the walls to the lights that hang.. How would you go about doing this.... […]
  • Re: franchise directory January 8, 2012
    Remember if  you approach a franchisor and that franchisor uses brokers you should be able to reduce your franchise fee by the price of the commision they would pay to a broker.    You have bargaining power before you sign the FA not after!!!!Moreover... […]

Blog Categories

Old Posts