The Inside Scoop
      on Franchises
 
 
 
CALL FOR BLOGGERS!
Do you have a professional perspective on franchising? Email or call Ryan @ 312-730-5089
 
 
 

Franchise or Business Opportunity?

Categories: Interesting, Legal
By Ryan Knoll on July 9, 2007 @ 9:03 am

Buying a Franchise versus a Business Opportunity

How to tell the difference between a franchise and biz opp and determine which is the better fit for you.

The primary differences mentioned by the author are:

  1. Common Brand and Operating System
  2. Ongoing Support
  3. Ongoing Fees
  4. Legal Disclosures

Basic stuff, but it is what you are paying for as a franchisee. If you feel able to pursue a business opportunity and can do so without piggy-backing on another brand, operating system, and support, then you may be better off going it alone and foregoing the franchise fees, royalty fees, advertising fees, operational constraints, and required purchases.

Update 7-10-2007: Good comment by the always alert Michael Webster:

The article was terrible. It leaves the misleading impression that there is such a catergory as biz ops which don’t have to prepare a UFOC. Uh, well then how would one account for the fact that the FTC routinely closes biz ops because the failed to comply with the Franchise Rule? Really bad article.”

Similar Posts:


AddThis Social Bookmark Button| | Permanent link





4 Responses to “Franchise or Business Opportunity?”  

  1. # 1 Michael Webster

    Ryan,

    The article was terrible.

    It leaves the misleading impression that there is such a catergory as biz ops which don’t have to prepare a UFOC.

    Uh, well then how would one account for the fact that the FTC routinely closes biz ops because the failed to comply with the Franchise Rule?

    Really bad article.


    [[ Quote ]]
  2. # 2 Ryan

    Michael Webster wrote on July 9, 2007 @ 6:10 pm:

    Ryan,

    The article was terrible.

    It leaves the misleading impression that there is such a catergory as biz ops which don’t have to prepare a UFOC.

    Uh, well then how would one account for the fact that the FTC routinely closes biz ops because the failed to comply with the Franchise Rule?

    Really bad article.

    Thanks, Michael. Admittedly, I skimmed the article and assumed bizop was referencing a purely entrepreneurial endeavor without a pseudo-franchisor. Thanks for the heads up.


    [[ Quote ]]
  3. # 3 Anonymous

    Michael Webster wrote on July 9, 2007 @ 6:10 pm:

    Ryan,

    The article was terrible.

    It leaves the misleading impression that there is such a catergory as biz ops which don’t have to prepare a UFOC.

    Uh, well then how would one account for the fact that the FTC routinely closes biz ops because the failed to comply with the Franchise Rule?

    Really bad article.

    The author from what I can tell is not falling within the definition of most franchise statutes. Selling a “guide” on how to conduct a business and offering “consulting” services in connection to it is not considered franchising.


    [[ Quote ]]
  4. # 4 Michael Webster

    Anonymous;

    I have no idea what you are talking about.

    Check out some of the bizops referred to in the article - UFOC required.


    [[ Quote ]]

Leave a Reply

(required)


About Us   |   Contact Us    |    Terms of Use    |   © Copyright 2005-2007
40 queries. 0.369 seconds.