Muslim Dunkin’ Donuts franchisee can sue over anti-pork stance
The decision reversed an Illinois federal court judge’s 2004 ruling that rejected Walid Elkhatib’s argument that Dunkin’ Donuts discriminated against him based on his race by making the sale of breakfast sandwiches with bacon, ham or sausage a mandatory part of his franchise agreement.According to court papers, Elkhatib, a Palestinian Arab, has been a Dunkin’ Donuts franchisee since 1979, before the company began selling any pork. Once breakfast sandwiches were introduced in 1984, Elkhatib’s Chicago-area outlets sold them without bacon, ham or sausage for nearly 20 years. The company did not object, even providing him with a sign that said “Meat Products Not Available.”
Who will win? My guess is the franchisor, as Dunkin’ Donuts has full discretion in deciding whether to renew the franchise agreement.
Similar Posts:
- Dunkin’ Donuts – New Restaurant Design
- Starbucks Back is Back to Breakfast
- Franchisor sues Franchisee for Hiring Illegal Aliens
- Dealing with Local Government Planning Boards
- Bagel Franchises have Reinvented Themselves
Ryan is an attorney and valuation specialist residing in Chicago. He chronicles his thoughts and research on FranchisePundit.com. You may reach him by email ryanknoll@gmail.com or mobile telephone 312-212-3423.
[...] Franchise Pundit references a decision that reversed an Illinois federal court judge’s 2004 ruling that rejected [...]