Invest $240,000, but don’t hold me responsible for anything!

Franchisors are always protecting their butts to the fullest extent possible, and that is often what franchisors hire me to do as their attorney. But, franchisees should be aware the rights they are giving up when signing a release, such as the one below from the 2007 UFOC of Snap Fitness.

The release requires the franchisee to give up any right to sue for any reason. Many U.S. states reserve certain legal action by franchisees to protect their financial investments from fraud, making the release unenforceable under certain circumstances. But signing a release does in many situations prevent a franchisee from using the courts to enforce a right or to protect themselves. And if you can’t sue, the franchisee will have little leverage over the issue when dealing with the franchisor.

Below is the release from Snap Fitness.

Read this doc on Scribd: snap-fitness-release


Similar Posts:

Article by Ryan Knoll

Ryan is an attorney and valuation specialist residing in Chicago. He chronicles his thoughts and research on FranchisePundit.com. You may reach him by email ryanknoll@gmail.com or mobile telephone 312-715-8115. Read 448 articles by
2 Comments Post a Comment
  1. FuwaFuwaUsagi says:

    The Pundit is correct. When you sign a FA you are giving up some rights. Make darn sure that what you are getting in return is worth their surrender.

    This topic came up in another forum recently. Below is a snippet of what I posted there:

    Here are a few valid reasons I have found to consider limiting your options via a franchise agreement.

    1) You cannot secure an “A” location without a franchise, and an “A” location is desirable AND lucrative.

    2) The franchise has either a demonstrable USP or a very obvious qualitative one.

    3) You need the training and the operational guidance of the concept, and consultants or trainers are not readily available in the market place.

    4) You are in a heavily technological or regulated industry and part of the zor’s obligations are to keep you abreast of changes and adjust the model accordingly AND there are no trade associations that can fulfill the gap.

    FuwaFuwaUsagi

  2. Ryan Knoll says:

    FuwaFuwaUsagi wrote on March 18, 2008 @ 3:27 pm:

    The Pundit is correct.

    When you sign a FA you are giving up some rights.

    Make darn sure that what you are getting in return is worth their surrender.

    This topic came up in another forum recently. Below is a snippet of what I posted there:

    Here are a few valid reasons I have found to consider limiting your options via a franchise agreement.

    1) You cannot secure an “A” location without a franchise, and an “A” location is desirable AND lucrative.

    2) The franchise has either a demonstrable USP or a very obvious qualitative one.

    3) You need the training and the operational guidance of the concept, and consultants or trainers are not readily available in the market place.

    4) You are in a heavily technological or regulated industry and part of the zor’s obligations are to keep you abreast of changes and adjust the model accordingly AND there are no trade associations that can fulfill the gap.

    FuwaFuwaUsagi

    Great points as always.

Leave a Reply




RSS Discussion Forum

  • Re: De-Identify February 7, 2012
    There are several issues here.1)   Ethics – though your franchisor may not have lived up to your expectations if they are meeting the letter of the law then I am not sure you have the moral upperhand.  If you signed on to pay and advertising fee without... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 5, 2012
    it would be leaving early..Its a Franchise that has lost over 30 units in the past few years. and is not living up to what we bought into.. advertising fee's are not being used on anything for the franchisee. and there is no support from the franchise... […]
  • Re: De-Identify February 4, 2012
    Quote from: jerichox on February 01, 2012, 08:27:34 AMJust wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of ... […]
  • De-Identify February 1, 2012
    Just wondering if you guys think its a smart idea for a franchisee to de-identify his store? Also.. Franchises normally have a list of items that need to be changed to the color of the walls to the lights that hang.. How would you go about doing this.... […]
  • Re: franchise directory January 8, 2012
    Remember if  you approach a franchisor and that franchisor uses brokers you should be able to reduce your franchise fee by the price of the commision they would pay to a broker.    You have bargaining power before you sign the FA not after!!!!Moreover... […]

Blog Categories

Old Posts